Higher Level Mathematical Reasoning

Mathematics presents students with a mode of"higher level activities" and "higher level mathematical
thinking/reasoning. It includes observation, attentionreasoning." When higher level activities are taught
to detail, analysis, synthesis, relevant question asking,through mere memorization or repetitive activities
and problem solving. It involves some valuable traitsdevoid of real understanding, they do not involve any
like the ability to handle sweat, frustration, deadreasoning at all. When lower level activities are taught
ends, perseverance, and the discovery, hopefully,in ways that make students really think, then those
that there is wonder, joy, and even some exhilarationstudents are involved with higher level mathematical
at the end. We invite students deeper into or higherreasoning. And math teaching need not hang its head
up this mode of reasoning year-by-year,and feel inferior to other academic disciplines while
subject-by-subject. So what is higher levelfocusing on these lower level activities.
mathematical reasoning?Another unfortunate answer to what is higher level
A look at some of the approved and adopted textsmathematical reasoning can be seen in the rush to
suggests that a typical answer is, "algebra." Algebra iscomplicate problem sets in textbooks. The geometry
generally considered to be higher level math thinkingbook that the student I tutor is using in school,
for today's school students. Constants, variables,published by a major publisher and state adopted, has
coefficients, expressions, equations, quadraticoutstanding higher level math reasoning problems to
equations, real, rational, and irrational numbers, andsolve. I'm having as much fun with some of them as
combining like terms... If we can just get middleI'm sure that authors and state committee members
school, upper and even lower elementary students tohad. But my student and many in her class are not.
start thinking about all of this, we believe that higherThere are precious few problems in any section of
level math reasoning is taking place!this book that allow students to develop a confident
But what about geometry students who haveunderstanding of the basic concepts and procedures
already passed Algebra I, but still have not masteredbefore "higher level math reasoning" is introduced in
basic number sense concepts involving fractions? Forthe form of clever and complicated levels of
example, I tutored a high school geometry studentapplication.
recently who did not realize that if amount A is halfRather than leaping to higher level activities that
as much as amount B, then amount B must be twicerequire fluent reasoning that has not yet been
as much as amount A. This student had memorizeddeveloped, the interests of students would be better
the formula for determining the measure of anserved if this book (and others like it) presented
inscribed angle (it is 1/2 the measure of itsstep-by-step contexts of problems of graduated
intercepted arc), and had solved many problemsdifficulty-each problem based on the reasoning
correctly. But when asked to find the measure ofdeveloped in the previous problem, and preparing
the arc when given the measure of the angle, thestudents for the next step of reasoning represented
student was stumped. It seems that for this student,in the following problem. The proper function of a
thinking about basic fractional relationships wasmath book is to develop mathematical reasoning, not
actually higher level mathematical reasoning-highermerely to create problems that require its use. By
than the current level of understanding.rushing to over-complicate the problems, textbooks
Higher level math reasoning for students is simplyunwittingly exclude many students from success,
whatever the next step is from where they areactually thwarting the development of their reasoning
now. The relationship between 1/2 and twice, or thatand forcing them to rely on mere memorization to
a group can be both one and many, or that a "1"cope with their work.
sitting in the tens column has a different value than aYes we need to keep earlier concepts and
"1" in the ones column are all good higher level mathprocedures alive by integrating them into the
thinking skills for students who do not yetproblems in subsequent chapters, and yes students
understand those concepts. People generally considerneed to explore multiple uses and applications, and
algebra more abstract than arithmetic, because ityes they need to use all of this to solve
appears to be less concrete-and therefore it must bemathematical problems and not merely perform
the flagship of "higher level mathematical reasoning."arithmetic calculations. I am not arguing against any of
But any concept is "abstract" to the student whothis. But enrichment is enriching and higher level
does not understand it yet!mathematical reasoning is only reasoning when
The critical element is not the level of difficulty ofstudents have access to it. We should take as much
the work, but whether or not the work is beingpride in opening up and developing that next level of
addressed through reasoning. Students who canhigher mathematical reasoning, whatever it may be,
factor quadratic equations because they haveas we do in the creative, clever, complicated, and fun
memorized a bunch of rules cannot be said to beproblems our mathematical minds conceive. We
applying higher level mathematical reasoning, unlessshould remember what it's like for those who are
they actually understand why they are doing whatlooking to us for guidance. What is higher level
they are doing. There is a big difference betweenmathematical reasoning for them?